Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
In this day and age, education is always regarded as a topic of interest. It is recorded that students are under obligation to study a host of subjects in some education systems while in other countries’ education, students are forced to concentrate on only their majors at the age of 15. Although each tendency has its own benefits, I believe that the former is much more advantageous.
Providing students with colossal subjects can give teachers a supportive assistance to help their students comprehend a great deal of useful information about all domains in life. More specifically, this way of educating can help them discover themselves and determine their capabilities as well as their passion about some of the subjects to make a right decision about career plans. Meanwhile, limiting some subjects on the syllabus can give students the best opportunity to specialize in their majors. Therefore, they will be able to hone their skills and expertise, which is believed to be beneficial for their job in the future.
Despite some positive outcomes in imposing children to learn particular subjects, the syllabus with all kinds of courses is far superior. That is because nowadays, numerous jobs require employees to have both the intimate expertise and integral skills such as communication skills, leadership together with the in-depth understanding of other aspects. As a result, teaching students can an extensive range of subjects can supply them with better chances for lucrative jobs. Finland is truly an exemplary model for the world’s education because it brings students a large number of courses taught by high-qualified teachers and in the most effective ways, which leads to an abundance of excellent students.
In conclusion, each trend embraces both strength and weaknesses but it is much more beneficial for schools to organize courses of full subjects for students rather than forcing them to study certain ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 67
- Internet users as percentage of population 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...bilities as well as their passion about some of the subjects to make a right decision about...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...’s education because it brings students a large number of courses taught by high-qualified teache...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8963985461 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4770714871 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315228968922 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105451903156 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935504316953 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186847154965 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752806473166 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...bilities as well as their passion about some of the subjects to make a right decision about...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...’s education because it brings students a large number of courses taught by high-qualified teache...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8963985461 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4770714871 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315228968922 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105451903156 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935504316953 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186847154965 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752806473166 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.