Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
In the essay i totally disagree about increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
In the one hand, the main advantage is this problem is to the country. It is because be able increasing the state's revenue. In this problem unrelated about traffic and polition. It'll be like that even if the price increases.
Taken as an example is state of debt will decline as the country increases revenue of state. Revenues are reallocated to help the underprivileged and other things.
As result, the state revenues are getting better but not change matter against traffic and pollution .
And the other hand about of benefit increasing the price but no resolving problem about traffic and pollution.
The disadvantage of this problem to affect for underpivileged that have vehicle. It is because somes people commonly use private vehicles to makr money.
And had to spend more money for buy retrol. Despite increased vehicle use petrol prices. Traffic and pollution is getting worse.
For example is online motorcycle and car service that have to feel this problem.
So that, it would not harming one part to have a need to improve state regulation regarding the wager of employees.
All in all, about increasing the price of petrol just disturbing for the common people and it did't take much about trafic and polution problem
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | monmon12345 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tanmeet | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | Maryam42 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with the young people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 56
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 56
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...y. It is because be able increasing the states revenue. In this problem unrelated abou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'increases'' or 'increase's'?
Suggestion: increases'; increase's
...ate of debt will decline as the country increases revenue of state. Revenues are realloca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nge matter against traffic and pollution . And the other hand about of benefit in...
^^
Line 6, column 37, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
.... The disadvantage of this problem to affect for underpivileged that have vehicle. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
...l this problem. So that, it would not harming one part to have a need to improve stat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00873362445 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60691605967 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3264980642 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.4705882353 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4705882353 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05882352941 7.06120827912 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.38176352705 228% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252713115436 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817939611872 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102586098579 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111572469605 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121512586885 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.