tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The reading passage discusses three advantages of the airships, which aeronautical engineers believe that airships could become popular again, and the lecturer casts doubts on each advantage.
First and foremost, the writer of the article claims that one of the advantages of airships is that those use gases rather than engine. Therefore, airships use less fuel than a typical aircraft. However, the lecturer refutes this claim. He explains that it is true that airships use less fuel but the special gases that serve as a fuel such as hydrogen and helium have many issues when operating. For example, hydrogen catches fire easily. Helium is difficult to obtain because is expansive. Consequently, it is hard to keep the balance of the safe and cost of those gases.
Secondly, the author of the reading passage points out that another advantage of airships is that they could be used in locations that is hard to be reached. On the contrary, the professor disagrees with this point. He said that operating in difficult locations such as picking up tree' logs in a dense forest, it will require that airship should be steady. Since airship is light like a balloon, it is hard to move in a stay way. Therefore, it will be impossible for airships to keep a steady balance, in order to operate in this types of environments.
Finally, the reading passage states that airships could replace satellites because they could rise high above the surface and stay there without refueling for a long time. On the other hand, the lecturer, cannot disagree more, by saying that airships could not replace satellites, yet. this is because they could not resist the high winds that are present in that height, which satellites are. In order to resists, airships should spend a lot of fuel, and as result they need to come back down to Earth for refueling. Consequently, to do this movements many times, it will cost a lot of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-14 | Cheese in Alaska | 70 | view |
| 2024-01-12 | saamaan | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 3 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | nusah | 68 | view |
- in the modern day people need planning ability 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success 73
- positive effects of televison are more than its negative effects 60
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 27
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, especially in the winding situation, they subsequently cannot use in the ment...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.275 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78443092131 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.274399283 49.2860985944 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.857142857 110.228320801 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 21.698381199 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.3589403974 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.