Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The reading text and lecture are both about the grave dating found in the 13 meter long ship is belong to the King to the King Raedwald rather than the East Anglian king. Lecturer believe that this jewlry is belong to the other king rather than the King Raedwald.
Firstly, The author argues that, archeologist suggest that the these coin found from this ship was 620s old. Additionally, he suggests that historian is evident that this king was died in 624. So, this gold is belonging to him. On the other hand, lecturer stance that, another evident despite of the author present is showing that, this king was died 25 year earlier that author says. moreover, there is also probability of uncertainty in dating of this artifacts.
Secondly, reading passage said that, this kind of great amount of gold is belonging to that king, which was powerful in this time. Writer also said that, King Raedwald was the only very powerful king during that time. In contrast, lecturer is opposing this, and saud that lot attacker are coming from the various area. So, there is possibility of theft of the older gold reserve of other king, which far bigger that the King Raedwald.
In the end, The Reading text showing that, at te time digging of this grave the worker found two spoon with imprints od the "Sauls" and "Pauls" , which was the christians. Who converts the king religions into the Christianity. Historial showing up that this king was a christians. on the other end, lecturer believe that this spoon was gifted to the king by this two christians.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-14 | Cheese in Alaska | 70 | view |
| 2024-01-12 | saamaan | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 3 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | nusah | 68 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...er than the East Anglian king. Lecturer believe that this jewlry is belong to the other...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...g. Lecturer believe that this jewlry is belong to the other king rather than the King ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belongs'
Suggestion: belongs
...his king was died in 624. So, this gold is belonging to him. On the other hand, lecturer sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...his king was died in 624. So, this gold is belonging to him. On the other hand, lecturer sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... died 25 year earlier that author says. moreover, there is also probability of uncertain...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...probability of uncertainty in dating of this artifacts. Secondly, reading passage...
^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belongs'
Suggestion: belongs
...that, this kind of great amount of gold is belonging to that king, which was powerful in thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...that, this kind of great amount of gold is belonging to that king, which was powerful in thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'spoon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'spoons'.
Suggestion: spoons
...ging of this grave the worker found two spoon with imprints od the 'Sauls' ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 'Sauls' and 'Pauls' , which was the christians. Who converts ...
^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Pauls' , which was the christians. Who converts the king religions into the Ch...
^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a (christians)' or simply 'christians'?
Suggestion: a (christians); christians
...Historial showing up that this king was a christians. on the other end, lecturer believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ing up that this king was a christians. on the other end, lecturer believe that th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85130111524 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5276007264 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475836431227 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4518550831 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427400690601 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180327838375 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0212295790764 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0326090709657 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145253336737 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.