Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
All thanks to globalization, countries all around the world are becoming alike in terms of their lifestyle, cuisine and culture. As every tremendous shift has merits and demerits, this phenomenon is no exception. This essay will bring forth two advantages along with concomitant disadvantages and will argue why the pros are overshadowed by its cons.
On a positive note, similarities between nations can curtail problems such as homesickness and cultural shock. Obviously, if numerous countries follow identical dietary habits as well as dressing code, immigrants would not confront cultural shock to a great extent. As one can enjoy their native delicacies even in foreign countries, they are less likely to miss their homeland. When I went to Singapore, for instance, for work, I was not feeling homesick as Indian cuisine was freely available at most of the major restaurant chains. Additionally, having similar brands or television channels would mitigate information overload since the sources are only a few instead of a gigantic number of media houses presenting, may be biased or unbiased, information. In this way, this striking alikeness can certainly have some serious benefits.
On the contrary, the individuality of nations and the creativity of people might suffer substantially. The reason is simple, if the majority of countries have similar fashion, food and belief system, there would be no uniqueness in the world. Being a traveller myself, it is hard to imagine Japan without their flashy traditional dresses or different delicacies served in Indian cuisine. There would be no excitement left in visiting nations which is a demerit that cannot be undermined. Also, sharing identical storylines in television serials or the same marketing strategies will surely have a devastating impact on the intelligent quotient of people because there will be no one to walk over the unconventional terrain. Netflix, for example, how monotonous it will be if this platform only had a limited set of screenplays, clearly, it's the diversity that brings excitement and creativity in work.
To conclude, although globalisation can solve issues such as homesickness and cultural disparity considerably, if it is happening at the cost of the individuality of countries and lack of creativity, without a doubt, this price cannot be justified in any way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-05 | sameerlekhi | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | bgoswamii | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | J.Amini | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 95 | view |
- You are a student at an English language school in Brighton and are living in private accommodation with other flatmates You ve not had hot water or heating for some time The landlord s workmen have tried to fix the problem but without success Write a let 78
- Some people think that public libraries are necessary while others believe that nowadays public libraries are no longer important What is your opinion 89
- Write a letter to a friend who is visiting your country for the first time Tell him the best time of the year to come What places they could visit Invite them to come to your house 59
- Many cities are replacing cars with bicycles What are the reasons for this Which do you think is better 87
- All students ought to study art and music in school To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pros are overshadowed by its cons. On a positive note, similarities between...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 838, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... a limited set of screenplays, clearly, its the diversity that brings excitement an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41192411924 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0861128952 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615176151762 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1584125525 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152019389538 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044862129665 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336948985536 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857907349894 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381735536996 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.