Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. Write a response
There are differing schools of thoughts on the benefits scientific researches would have on the overall betterment of a nation. Indisputably, the consequences a research would have on a nation might be totally different from the government's expectations due to their unclear outcomes. However, precluding a scientific research even before it is executed would be a bad step for the government to take. The prompt recommends that governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. In my opinion, i would strongly disagree with this and would rather support that the government fund scientific researches even without knowing the output.
Science is a very broad field of study. It encompasses different aspects of life. Science has been known to be a boon and bane to life. However, the predictability of science brings about complacency. When the outcome of a study is predictable, there is no enthusiasm in knowing what the results of that study would be. Recommending that the government turn away from funding these researches because of this reason is too facile. Most scientific researches that have brought about process in our day to day life did not include the end result of the research before it was carried out. For example, a group of scientists may embark on a research experiment to find a cure a disease whose symptoms are known but the disease itself is unknown. The end result of this study might even be a cure for a totally different disease which cure wasn't know. Due to this unclear outcome, a cure of a different disease has been found.
Most scientific researches known by the public to be funded by private companies may actually be funded by the government in closet. The government itself maybe scared of the outcome of a research due to how the masses may react to it and not because the outcome is unclear. A private company working on a nuclear experiment might be funded by the government without the knowledge of the masses. It could be hat this project would not be accepted by the masses because of how they would see the outcome.
In conclusion, I would expect that, if you have read up till this point, you would certainly agree with me that the government should fund scientific research even with no pre-knowledge of its outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | sark | 60 | view |
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or di 66
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response 50
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 82
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 64
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onsequences are unclear. In my opinion, i would strongly disagree with this and w...
^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... a totally different disease which cure wasnt know. Due to this unclear outcome, a cu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9383033419 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83870982519 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442159383033 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5991586453 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.05 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320907940694 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111827175 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15048337697 0.0758088955206 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212945828307 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112955848965 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.