In some countries today, there is an attitude that ‘anyone can do it’ in the arts – music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.
Do you agree or disagree?
I agree that in some countries people with no talent became rich and famous. However, I think the reason why those people became famous is the society itself because today in our society people hype up untalented people. You do not have to be good at anything, just have a cute face and a nice body then go take some videos for the internet and now you are famous. Because society only hypes up people in their beauty standard which leads to letting real talent down.
In the past art, music, literature and acting was the most appreciated thing. Because doing these kinds of works requires real talent and only talented people are supposed to have appreciation. But unfortunately, I agree that now there is an attitude in some places that anyone can do arts, music etc. Yet this is not true and an extremely invalid point of view. Whereas even though there are some things that anyone can do, those things do not require talent. For instance, you do not have to be talented to do sports but you have to be talented to do dance, gymnastics, contortion. You do not have to be talented to have a company that releases a movie, a show, a song, an album but you have to be talented to be an actor, an actress, and a singer. So there are huge differences.
Although I believe that there are a lot of untalented people who have become famous, I think there are also talented people who are still appreciated and valued. For example Hollywood actors and actresses such as Leonardo Dicaprio, Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie, Tom Cruise, Margot Robbie etc. and also some singers such as Rihanna, Beyonce, Adele, Nicki Minaj etc. who are very talented and who still got the hype despite the unappreciation in real talent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 82 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures 61
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 73
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 78
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or the internet and now you are famous. Because society only hypes up people in their b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6262295082 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43309617582 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52131147541 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.578468735 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451167763276 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145449708313 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106139370409 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265137506553 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105295542002 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.