organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the enviroment
Nowadays, more and more citizens chose travelling to the mountainous areas as a relaxing activity. This tourism development may exert positive impacts on the local people. However, in terms of environment, the growth in number of visitors might become a detrimental factor to the nature there.
The people living in those areas can reap tremendous benefits from visitors. The most noteworthy is that tourism can bring to them financial benefits in many ways. A huge employees is required in order to develop tourism service such as workers for construction, staff and waiters for hotels, restaurant. As a consequence, more occupational opportunities are dispensed to the native residents. Secondly, ethnic groups in remote areas can broaden their knowledge through interacting with the tourists. They can get to know more about different cultures.
On the contrary, the environment in these places can be exacerbated because of the growing of tourism. Firstly, the need of developing tourism service in remote areas entails demand for deforestation to build up roads, hotels. As an inevitable result, this destruction will diminish the air quality and even worse; many rare species are threatened because they will face the fact that their living places will be lost forever. Secondly, the act that building too many skyscrapers or open more luxury restaurant and hotel can ends up in the loss of cultural identity. For a long time, these areas are well-known for its magnificent nature and unique customs so if we construct artificial buildings, the nature would be forgotten and the local people would lose their traditional manners.
In closing, many people can benefits from the development of tourism in remote areas because it will be the income for the local people there. However, offering services such as hotels or road can end up in destroying the environment there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | king123478 | 67 | view |
- many people think it is very important to protect the environment but they make no effort to do it themselves why is the case what actions can be done to encourage individuals to protect the environment 61
- The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences Do you agree or disagree 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences Do you agree or disagree 95
- organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the enviroment 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
Nowadays, more and more citizens chose travelling to the mountainous areas as a relaxing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...financial benefits in many ways. A huge employees is required in order to develop tourism...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'end'
Suggestion: end
...en more luxury restaurant and hotel can ends up in the loss of cultural identity. Fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84385302011 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1410749026 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193701365902 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650418926805 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796042315333 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132631470418 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335005464371 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.