Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and
historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with
this opinion?
With the advent of globalization, countries are sharing closer bonds with the progress in the tourism industry. In this context, the school of thought that visitors should be charged a hefty amount to get an entry in the popular monuments and heritage places as compared to the local crowd is opposed by many in the favor of the country's standard and respect. I am in discord with the given statement and think that this discrepancy should not exist in a progressive nation. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on the driving thoughts behind this mentality, followed by my personal opinion on the same.
To begin with, the biased attitude to discriminate tourists in terms of monetary benefits can result in a bad reputation among all the nations. This action can lead to lowering the popularity of famous places at global levels. Also, tourists will get insecure about getting dupped by the local guides and public authorities, as a result, the entire tourism structure gets shaken. For instance, bad word of mouth by international tourists will put the country's prestige at stake.
Furthermore, a separate charge list for foreign visitors may result in losing their confidence in government policies, which will be highly synonymous with a downfall in the tourism industry. Moreover, it can lower the status of the nation, and at the same time can have a bad impact on overseas business and hence on economic growth. For example, the immense reduction in the number of visitors due to increased disparity can hit the income of the local region and GDP as a whole.
To conclude, it is erroneous to follow a distinct billing procedure for outsiders. In order to showcase the country's prestigious monuments, an unbiased approach towards the local and international visitors is the need of the hour, and hence I believe that a regulated and strict law should be followed by the country to be termed as a respectful and a progressive nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | quang1944 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012 78
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 583, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...s behind this mentality, followed by my personal opinion on the same. To begin with, the bias...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98475609756 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77586901089 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9700555843 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190527085067 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644835492502 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405475195306 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112411968209 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468161038916 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.