eat at home or at the restaurant
Food serves multiple purposes, from meeting basic survival needs to providing comfort. In many cases, food is also connected with love and memories. We can prepare food by ourselves at home as well as eat out. From my perspective, I prefer eating at home to outside in restaurants.
Admittedly, some people may argue that eating outside is time-saving and convenient. If our schedules are too busy, eating outside could absolve us the trouble of cooking so that we could devote the time to something more important. For example, in my senior year in college, there was a time when my roommate Martha was burning the candle at two ends: she was an intern in a company and the deadline of her thesis was approaching. Therefore, it was impossible for her to allocate time for cooking. So, what she did was having a quick breakfast at the street dining car and ordering takeout food for lunch and dinner. In this way, she saved the time spent on preparing food and got to focus on her work and study.
However, ready-made food sold outside can be disturbing from the hygiene’s point of view. It is because that as customers, we are oblivious of how the ingredients are chosen and processed. Thus, we do not know for sure whether the food is clean and safe. In contrast, eating at home does not have such problems. If we eat at home, we can “monitor” the whole process, from doing the grocery shopping to serving the dish on the table. For example, my mother is a believer of “you are what you eat”. So, she will get up 5 o’clock in the morning and drives to the largest market in town to buy the freshest ingredients. Besides, she also pays attention to the nutrients, making sure that we have balanced meals. As a result, my entire family are athletic and seldom get sick. For this reason, she will go to the local market to pick the freshest food, and prepare them herself. Only after washing them with running water three times will she start cooking. Moreover, she always sees to it that the kitchen utensils are clean and shiny, which is also essential for food safety. Conversely, no one obsessed with eating outside is sure that most of the food he/she eat outside is as clean as those made at home.
In a nutshell, even though eating outside has its advantage, it is not enough to outweigh the health benefits provided by eating at home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | Vilnius | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | sara2020 | 70 | view |
| 2020-05-20 | ankitapatel | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | DaVa20011218 | 80 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | DaVa20011218 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1159, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'eats'.
Suggestion: eats
...de is sure that most of the food he/she eat outside is as clean as those made at ho...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is as clean as those made at home. In a nutshell, even though eating outsid...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63571428571 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49714008754 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8174993737 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.125 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280449526399 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966926034108 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139317324631 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235503497908 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892468359677 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.