The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
The flow chart presented illustrates direct and indirect damages produced by deforestation.
From trees cutting activities four branches lead to four consequences. Heavy machineries needed for clear cutting bring a compression of the forest soil which becomes harder and "baked". This "innocent" problem brings flooding due to the inability of the soil to absorbe rain water.
Another major consequence is the reduction of biodiversity, caused by the growth of pioneer species and the degradation of vegetation. Three chart branches converge here. One exposes the erosion of the soil caused by the lack of support once given by roots. Another reason for the degradation of vegetation is the reduction of precipitation brought by the reduction of moisture air returned from plants.
The last cause of this problem is the increasing risk of fire. Forrest fires destroy waste wood which is the main food of micro-organisms thus increasing pioneer species, vegetation degradation on the already mentioned biodiversity reduction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Other think that it is better to work for different organisation 56
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 61
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 67
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and further projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73076923077 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41562619458 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0068286996 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.078376811477 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336645477861 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546634731748 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631501184307 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690711927715 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.