Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the
movies that the person likes
If the aim is to learn about other people, which measure is a better way? Although some believes learning from what they read or which movies they watch may stand as a best choice, there’re still lots of way can precisely know what others like.
It is so argued that people can learn a lot about other people from the books they like, because what they are reading at may reveal what they interest in. For example, people who love reading books introducing other countries may love travel, and people who read books about economic may buy some stocks recently. The Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, nowadays, people rarely read books. After working, they may already feel exhausted, hence they just want to use electronic devices on bed, so there will be no energy or time left for reading a book. By contrast, nowadays, people often use smart phone to gain knowledge or watch news. What news or articles do people read on phone may actually reveal what they really like. 11
Supporters of learning others from which movies may still argue that a person who watch romantic movie may show that he just fell in love or broke up with someone. The real picture of this idea, however, is that everybody loves to watch movies, it is not practical to tell what others love through movies. People who watch sci-fi or war movies may not mean that they like science or guns. They may just watch it as a relief of pressure from work. Besides, nowadays, people watch YouTube videos more often than watch movies. By comparison, learn others through YouTube may be a better way due to YouTube has more categories than movies. People who need to take a test, may watch some tutorial; people who love cooking may learn how to do it on internet; people who. Hence, it’s will be a better way to know a person’s background through what videos he watches. 14
Knowing what books or movies others watch is not necessarily a cog to learn them. What websites or videos they see on phone may be a more efficient way.
- One of the greatest challenges in modern society is to have up to date skills for one s work To better achieve this the government should give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to catch up their work skills Do you think this is an effective 70
- Do you agree or disagree the universities should spend more money in improving facilities libraries computer labs than hiring famous teacher 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- Some companies provide important products or services but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment As a consequence some people claim government should resort to greater penalty tax and fine to contain the harm made by these con w 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...or which movies they watch may stand as a best choice, there’re still lots of way...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, hence, however, if, may, really, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64640883978 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25593039359 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486187845304 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3599442197 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148814106079 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572715462996 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534326666012 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107022478628 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271711356573 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.