Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a fact that the demonstration of the effectiveness of chemicals based on undertaking animal testing becomes more and more popular. Although a part of the community completely approves due to its benefit to society, the others vote to suspend the abuse of this method since it is an unforgivable sin. From a personal perspective, responsibility towards this problem should be shouldered by the government.
It can not be denied that most commercial use is based on the successful testing on animals. Obviously, animals used in research, such as rats, are small, exist in a large number, and reproduce quickly, so, their death due to a failed testing can not cause an imbalance in the society or ecosystem. Besides, having the structure of a living body such as hearts or lungs, dissimilar to unlike flora, enables fauna to respond to chemicals’s effect, which will produce results faster and less risky than testing on humans. For instance, if rats are dead while examining for Covid 19 vaccine, vivisectionists can do research again without any difficulty in finding new testing objects. In contrast, were the vaccine to fail while testing on the human body, scientists would be criticized by society.
On the other hand, nowadays there has been a growing concern among countries over whether they should ban animal experiments because of their drawback. It is widely accepted that although animals are living bodies, they are different from the human body in physiological, biochemical, and metabolic ways. In this regard, successful medicine tested on animals may cause pernicious effects on humans such as shock or even death. On top of that, failure arising from those experiments can lead to genetically modified organism which can show a pathogenic or infectious potential, as depicted in science fiction. As this happens, humanity will be heading for the most terrible catastrophe that we have ever seen.
In conclusion, performing laboratory testing on animals is neither human nor vain, but a peculiar mixture of construction and destruction. Innovation would have died out if it had not been for the death of those animals.
- Many business owners find that their staff lacks sufficient interpersonal skills such as the ability to cooperate with their coworkers What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 95
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 87
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people say job satisfaction is more important than job security others think people cannot always enjoy their jobs so having a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... animals used in research, such as rats, are small, exist in a large number, and ...
^^
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entists would be criticized by society. On the other hand, nowadays there has be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19884726225 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94993620192 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608069164265 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.067720452 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.266666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236756184054 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729071436135 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580437522942 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126162254531 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060854066275 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.