The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Every action brings consequences in a persons’ life whether it’s positive or negative. Every time anyone do a thing, they always want to do the positive things because those are the right things to do. The prompt indicates that praising a positive action and ignoring negative ones are the best way to teach and I am strongly agreed with this for two reasons.
Praising positive action and ignoring other is a way to differentiate which work to do and what don’t. Suppose if the society teach us that honesty is the best policy and some is honest than he or she should be praised then everyone will want to be honest. Then the society will leave venality other side. So, people will know that if he or she is honest they do the right thing. Because of the adulation, everyone will know the difference between this bad thing and good thing. Also, other virtues like altruism is a good thing. The bad things like murder, theft will be considered bad.
Also, People will be motivated to do right thing. Motivation will come from praising from the society. People has a tendency to bring attention towards them. They always want to be considered the best with their good work. But, with time they do the bad work to be successful. However, they won’t be satisfied ever because the bad things can bring bad consequences. If someone murder a person, they will be thrown in prison and can be punished with the law. But Good things often brings reward. So, if the process of teaching has the ability to differentiating actions like positive and negative ones and show the consequences then surely anyone can learn perfectly.
In sheer contrast, if there was no praise for positive ones then anyone can do bad things and think it as a good one to do in their circumstances. But with growing tensions everywhere and the winning of negative power all over the world it is quite difficult to give the best teaching without acknowledge the best works and praise then with open arms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...positive or negative. Every time anyone do a thing, they always want to do the pos...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'murders'.
Suggestion: murders
... can bring bad consequences. If someone murder a person, they will be thrown in prison...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70689655172 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47998161797 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7602560082 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.52380952381 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163523719953 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576329289587 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083043347881 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132566746741 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605825178531 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.