No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Right from the inception of human species on planet earth, we have been always coming up with something new - making fire, inventing wheel, putting different forms of energy to use, discovery of electricity, inventing the computer, and so on. The prompt suggests that in order to make a significant advance in any field, it must incorporate knowledge and experience from different fields as well. This is increasingly becoming true in the present world and I agree with the prompt for the following reasons.
Firstly, as mentioned in the introduction, we have been and inquisitive species right from the beginning. We have always kept ourselves busy foraging from new discoveries, spending time tirelessly trying to invent something new so as to solve a problem, etc. In the inchoate stages of our existence, it was sufficient to spend quite some time tinkering with things related to a particular field to come up with something substantial in that field. We have done that for so long that it looks like we have exhausted all the possibilities of making a significant advancement in various fields when if we study them as stand alone entities. Thus, to make a consequential advancement or to solve the problems in today's world, we have to meld knowledge and experience from various fields. The problems that are present in today's world, be it global warming, poverty, endangered wildlife etc cannot be solved when we label them as belonging to a particular field. In contrast, they should be seen as problems that require expertise from different fields to surmount them.
Secondly, fields that we used to see as independent fields in the past are evolving into mutlidisciplinary fields in the present world. The problems that we face today necessitates the existence of such interdisciplinary fields. Roboitcs, Mechatonics, Neuro Physics, etc are a few of many such fields that are increasing becoming important to solve problems that cannot be solved otherwise. For instance, let us take the example of Robotics. This field requires the knowledge of Mechanics, Electical Engineering and Computer Science to make any pivotal progress in the field of Robotics. Therefore, as one can see, there is growing importance for multidisciplinary fields which is only anticipated to grow even further.
However, in the realms of our discussion, we cannot a few exceptions. There are few fields like Astro Physics, Nuclear Physics, etc that entails a profound knowledge only in those fields for the scientists to make substantial advancements in those fields. Spending countless hours in understanding different concepts only in such fields can be highly can be fecundity to make appreciable advancments in those fields.
To recapitulate, in the present world, knowledge from different fields should be combined in order to solve present day problems. There is also prolifiration of inter-disciplinary fields that entail knowledge and experience from various fields. However, there are a few fields that require a deep understanding of only those fields to make progress in them.
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 58
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Alth 83
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 66
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 16
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...relessly trying to invent something new so as to solve a problem, etc. In the inchoate s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE_NN[1]
Message: This world is usually written together in this context: 'standalone'.
Suggestion: standalone
...various fields when if we study them as stand alone entities. Thus, to make a consequential...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standalone'?
Suggestion: standalone
...various fields when if we study them as stand alone entities. Thus, to make a consequential...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28920570265 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11212447673 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460285132383 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4925127095 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.045454545 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3181818182 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237846872684 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836515832428 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578011524064 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157520172578 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210074146031 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.