No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not uncommon for someone to argue that if people don't cooperate with scholars outside of their field, there would not be any improvement. Proponents of the argument is people can learn from a total different view and have interaction without the boundary of discipline. In fact, I think the statement is insightful, but there is some flaw in it.
It is widely accepted that when there is a contentious question, there is probably an innovation, which means if the research or study is shackled in one field with homogeneous views, people won't get any breakthrough. Only when the new idea is introduced can they come up with new conclusion. This shows the importance to incorporates knowledge and experience from outside the field. For example, when inventing the underwater machine, scientists have no idea about how to detect the obstacle under the water since it is dark and mystery. Until they capture the motion of underwater animals, they finally get to use the sound as a perfect way to determine the distance. Of cause learning animals' behavior is out of their field, by using this knowledge, they solve the problem.
However, people will argue does it means doing every research should use the knowledge outside of the field, or if scientists use the experience outside the field, will they make great contributions? The answer is possibly not as mixed knowledge may lead to a false conclusion. That is because different subjects have different laws and regulation, some of them may be contradictory with another. In that case, the inter discipline studying may confuse the researches and have no use. Another reason is when considering the science field, some knowledge may seem useless such as poem and language.
Moreover, the third problem to use knowledge and experience outside of the field is that instead of finding the view on how to use them, why not devote into one field and make breakthrough. The scientists are easily to get detracted to do a research if they try to use different knowledge, and studying a totally new field must take their time and spirits. To make things worse, for most of time, it is rarely easy to learn a knowledge, people have to build another system as well as do experiment in order to understand the theory. For example, to learn a subject based both on computer science and finance needs both math skills and comprehensive ability. People may feel hard to learn both of them, and they could not learn either of them well.
In a word, I think in some situation, it is beneficial to adopt knowledge and experience from outside that field as the collision between different subjects may contribute a new finding. However, when people have no spare time and spirit, it is better not to study different discipline at the same time, since it may lead to confusion as well as contradictory.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position 66
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 58
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mon for someone to argue that if people dont cooperate with scholars outside of thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: Of course
... perfect way to determine the distance. Of cause learning animals behavior is out of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
.... However, people will argue does it means doing every research should use the kno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: mean
.... However, people will argue does it means doing every research should use the kno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ntradictory with another. In that case, the inter discipline studying may confuse the res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, well, for example, i think, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88453608247 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75857025509 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461855670103 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4790329223 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.80952381 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213705143814 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704214408634 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597483936936 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130450095606 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251918092136 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mon for someone to argue that if people dont cooperate with scholars outside of thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: Of course
... perfect way to determine the distance. Of cause learning animals behavior is out of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
.... However, people will argue does it means doing every research should use the kno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: mean
.... However, people will argue does it means doing every research should use the kno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ntradictory with another. In that case, the inter discipline studying may confuse the res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, well, for example, i think, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88453608247 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75857025509 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461855670103 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4790329223 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.80952381 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213705143814 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704214408634 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597483936936 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130450095606 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251918092136 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.