Line Graph
The given line diagram illustrates how many people had visited the island of Caribbean in between 2010 and 2017. Two dotted lines are indicating stay of visiting people either on cruise ships or on island. Solid line represents total number of visitors.
Firstly, in 2010 the number of visitors were less as compare to all the following years, as only 1 million people visited Caribbean Island in 2010. After that as the years passed by the numbers of people visiting island increased dramatically. Moreover, as per year 2017 the total number of visitors had risen to 3.5 million.
Secondly, up to year 2015, people were drawn towards staying on the island, as the number of people staying on cruise ships were relatively less. In year 2010 and 2012 only quarter million people were staying on cruise ships, whereas third quarter million people and 1.25 million people were staying on island in 2010 and 2012 respectively. When year 2016 had came situation had been changed, 1.5 and 2 million people were staying on cruise ships, however only 1.25 and 1.5 million people were staying on island in 2016 and 2017 respectively.
Overall, as time passed more and more people were visiting Caribbean Island and moreover, more people were staying on cruise ships.
- Information Table
- Most employers nowadays put increasing emphasis on social skills Some people beliefs that social skills are important in addition good qualification for job success To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many offenders commit more crime after serving punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 73
- A hundred years ago people thought that human race was steadily improving in every area of life Now it seems this is not certain in all situations In which areas do you think we have made important progress nowadays In which areas do you think we still ne 61
- Line graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n 2010 the number of visitors were less as compare to all the following years, as ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00473933649 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36725943921 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445497630332 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5107514452 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0467532674896 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415284354554 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651514724676 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498225988973 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862952726553 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.