The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy of four countries from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph illustrates the budget for research into alternative resources in Switzerland, Denmark, Spain, the UK during twenty-five years.
It was evident that Switzerland and Denmark followed an upward trend while there was a rapid decline in Spain and the UK. The most noticeable change was seen in the expenditure of Switzerland.
Standing at zero money in 1975, the investment per person in Switzerland boomed by 2.6 dollars in 1980, rising further to over 5 dollars in 2000. Entering the later neighbor, Denmark paid 1.8 dollars for each citizen in 1980, followed by a gradual increase until 1995, before went up to 3 dollars in 2000.
In contrast, despite the same initial year of the budget, Spain and the UK were short of research funds into renewable resources. In 1980, the expense in Spain bounced, reaching a peak of 1 dollar apiece, followed by a substantial decrease of 0.5 dollars in 1990, before a slight upward trend in the remaining years. Regarding British scientists' funding, the data surged, reaching a peak of 0.9 dollars in 1985, followed by dipped gradually until 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Nguyễn Phúc Phương Trâm | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | nganluu0903 | 52 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | melodylcc | 84 | view |
| 2017-04-18 | Hiko | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy of four countries from 1975 to 2000 89
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 10
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02732240437 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72906919786 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1786685893 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107339314962 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486855451013 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04889694233 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066280194473 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430272311866 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.