the graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy for four countries from 1975 to 2000.
The line chart illustrates that how many expenditures four western countries have spent on the eco-friendly energy between 1975 to 2000.
It is easy to notice that there was no money allocation in this area among the four countries in 1975. During the first five years, the figure for Switzerland and Denmark shared the same similarity, soared to 2.5 dollars per person and 1.8 dollars/p/p respectively, after which one in Switzerland constantly jumped to the peak(5.2) in the 2000 and far more than other counterparts. As for the expense that Denmark government spent, it nearly remained the same pattern from 1980 to 1995 and suddenly skyrocket to 3 dollars/p/p in 2000.
By contrast, the number of the UK suffered a 0.7 decrease though it gradually reaches the highest point in 1985 and exceeded one for Spain. At the same time, Spain’s data climbed to 1 dollar/p/p in 1980 and fluctuate slowed to 0.9 dollars/p/p and outnumbered the UK’s spending after 1990.
Simply put, governments in Switzerland and Denmark showed great support for the development of eco-friendly energy and the development in the UK and Spain hardly processed some progress.
- the diagram shows the process of how to make smoked fish Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 93
- the charts showe the percentage of male and female students getting top graded in 1960 and 2000. 67
- the table describes the changes in people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. 61
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its further development 63
- The diagram below shows how fruit is canned. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94161812851 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645502645503 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3543114658 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220129846347 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968734935633 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582051041603 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126129805732 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594325074608 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.