In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy.
What are the causes?
What can be done to address this situation?
Without a shadow of a doubt, with afoot progression and augmentation of societies, human beings are struggling with miscellaneous upheaval-causing problems. One of which is about juvenile persons who are getting affluent while becoming desolated and dejected. There exists some reasons why it begets, and what we can do to resolve this great tribulation. We are going to cover both questions succinctly.
To find the root causes of this problem, some reasons have been put forward. First and foremost, when making a bundle, a person gradually drifts away from the warm hug of the family, intuitively leading to becoming more isolated. For instance, Dr. Kim, who is one of the trailblazers in the field of psychology, avers that evidence suggests there holds a linear relation between lugubriousness and profusely making a living. Moreover, over time , such persons lose their intimate and courteous friends, and thus, under no condition will they no longer be able to bank on other people, whatsoever.
To tackle such raised problems, there are some logical solutions so that by dint of them, one can obviate those successfully. One way is on the shoulder of NGOs, who can open up some new avenues, such as establishing the laughing group and holding an affable meeting, for these sort of person who would not have otherwise had. Furthermore, these persons can donate some parts of their riches to charities. In this way, not merely can this method be deemed as a way of purification and catharsis but also they can improve the sense of camaraderie among needed children.
To briefly recapitulate, we can boil this essay down on two items: (1) some reasons bring about this problem, namely cutting down on the relation with family, and losing sole mate, (2) to addressing this issue, there are two ways, i.e., helping of NGOs, and magnanimously giving alms to indigents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | MEBC Class | 100 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summaries the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate. 100
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ely making a living. Moreover, over time , such persons lose their intimate and co...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...oup and holding an affable meeting, for these sort of person who would not have otherwise ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07443365696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84205081967 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637540453074 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1756263389 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219594096974 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702496034502 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520228859239 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121760566674 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188854433892 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.