The Graph shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The manifested graph evinces the mean amount of carbon dioxide, AKA CO2, which was emitted per capita in four different European countries, i.e., the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal in the course of the four-tenths of a century commencing from 1967.
Regarding the graph, as can be seen, the United Kingdom, located in the north of Europe, the number of its carbon emission inexorably dwindled in the duration of this period from ca. 11 metric tonnes to 9 or thereabouts in 2007. Notwithstanding, Sweden initially went through an increase from above 8 to around 10 in the first decade, accompanied by a decline in the rest of the period (5 metric tonnes more or less). But it is worth mentioning that the slope of the latter aforementioned country in the two last decades was milder than the second decade, i.e., from 1977 to 1987.
According to the graph, it can be found that Italy, located in the south of Europe like Portugal, at the onset, experienced a high increase in producing CO2 from above 4 in 1967 to approximately 6 in 1977 while trying to prevent from more emission in the last thirty years. Moreover, turning to Portugal, the amount of its emission constantly escalated from 1 to 6 in 2007 so that the amount of its emission outpaced from Sweden in 2007.
Overall, we can clearly see that; nonetheless, the northern European countries, such as the UK and Sweden, were attempted to decrease the amount of CO2 emissions, the southern countries canceled out their attempts.
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, while, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84375 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77024464102 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5169551358 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215934043685 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875347844186 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602859297075 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123634245832 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487345742455 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.