Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree.
One of the essential criteria of a good company is the knowledge of the employees. Controversy exists over whether employees should have paid for an academic study by their companies or not. In my vantage point, companies have to invest in other ways of workforce upgrade.
The first crucial point worth mentioning is that companies have to fund in-service training instead of academic education. Companies should pay attention to the academic degree they are considering during the hiring. After that, they should invest in their staff's practical experiences. In order to increase work efficiency, companies have to plan to develop practical skills because the most critical attribute of competent employees is their practical work experiences. Consider a company that requires a particular skill in one of their sections: if they pay for an employee who is working at the department to participate in a workshop, not only do employers take advantage of it, but also the employee profit from it. The worker achieves a higher level of experience; the company raises its workforce's knowledge and abilities without losing its staff and recruiting a new one.
Furthermore, paying employees for university degrees by companies leads to a decline in work efficacy significantly. Studying at university and having a full-time job at the same time is impossible if you expect to do both of them at a satisfying level. When workers are busy studying, their performance will gradually decrease because they cannot focus their minds on work duties, as they did. Even the companies that give a leave of absence to their employees have to substitute them for new staff, who should be trained. Hence, there is no economic justification for companies. For instance, imagine a travel agency that pays two of its personnel to get an academic education, so employers should teach new staff how to communicate professionally with their clients. Therefore, it gives rise to wasting time and money. In other words, it has a wide-ranging influence on companies.
All in all, there are many ways to improve the knowledge of employees. It is suggested that companies should concentrate on in-service training and endeavor to increase efficiency.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25770308123 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98312620748 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557422969188 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7307268645 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7894736842 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277480256436 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839735378443 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773065849497 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160025485265 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671342501719 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.