The quality of life in large cities is decreasing. What could be the reasons behind this? What measures can be taken to resolve this problem?
In today’s world of increasing urbanization and modernization, more and more people are now living in big cities but it is also believed that the living standard there is declining. The root reasons for this problem are environmental pollution and crime rate which can be addressed by practical actions of both individuals and society.
The quality of living in big cities is worse because of some culprits. Firstly, big cities are home to many giant companies, corporations, and educational institutions, so that they are desirable destinations for many people not only within countries but also from abroad. This leads to tremendous negative effects on people’s life. For example, the increasing population will certainly cause traffic congestion as well as lower air quality. Secondly, in some big cities, the crime rate is believed to be considerably higher. Consequently, people will live under constant fear and threat since they can easily be robbed or injured anytime. This results in their stress-related illness. For example, in some Latin American cities, women are not encouraged to be outside alone at night.
There are some solutions that can be taken to better the situation. Firstly, for pollution problems, the measures have always been developing better public transportation systems and investing in cleaner energy. Individuals and authorities and join hands and improve this situation gradually. Secondly, it is scientifically proved that a peacefully, clean, and happy external environment can evidently reduce the crime rate. This is a factor that the government should consider carefully when planning urban regions. Most importantly, I truly believe that providing citizens with many opportunities and guidance to better their life is the most effective way to resolve this problem.
In conclusion, there are many factors that can reduce urban life quality such as environmental pollution and crime; however, there are also measures and solutions to reduce these effects. Mainly by planning our cities more wisely, taking care of our environment and its socio-economic effects on peoples' life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | Huy Do | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | LE ANH HUY | 73 | view |
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The quality of life in large cities is decreasing What could be the reasons behind this What measures can be taken to resolve this problem 78
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to the individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development 56
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51840490798 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00791389708 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573619631902 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.694402229 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254490769428 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784141835194 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533252101543 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15274089548 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335978606654 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51840490798 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00791389708 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573619631902 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.694402229 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254490769428 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784141835194 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533252101543 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15274089548 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335978606654 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.