In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. it is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In todays modern world, an increase in the amount of fast food consumed has a direct relationship with the health issues. I agree that imposing higher taxes on this kind of food plays an important role, governments should also adopt other method to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, higher taxes can do wonders for controlling the consumption of fast food. First of all, high taxes lead to higher prices of this product. This can influence on the budget of customers and prevent them from spending money on buying fast food. For example, in some country having high rate of obesity people, tax of fried chickens or pizza is up to 10% per portion that makes the demand decrease. Moreover, government can use these taxes to fund the medical researches. Medical experiments and trials to search for new drugs preventing the public from health issues are supposed to be expensive and need more efforts. This is why government should embark in this measurement.
On the other hand, imposing taxes might exert negative impacts on fast food industry. The first drawback is that to make high profits and cover the running costs, some stores tend to reduce the quality of their products that lead to more serious human being problems. The cut off their costs by reusing cooking oils many times and less fresh ingredients. For example, in big city such as Hanoi capital of Vietnam, it is easy to catch the seller using freeze meat to make fast food in many restaurants. In addition, there are some practical solutions for this problem instead of imposing taxes such as raising the awareness of people about nutrients and health effects of fast food, being environmentally friendly.
In conclusion, I agree that high taxes can be effective way to protect human being. However, we should embrace other method to raise people heath consciousness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od to raise people heath consciousness.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92926045016 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52135962743 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9694496213 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364243834929 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113667938621 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812646751639 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214988848303 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104233614705 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.