If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
The statement posited states that among two equally deserving job aspirants, the one with experience in the field has to be provided with the privilege. The validity of the statement is subjective and it relies on the nature of the job, field of expertise needed for the job and other myriad factors. Experience is not the most significant factor when it comes to performing well in a job, it is only one among the many facets that matters. A fresher, straight out of college who has a good academic profile and has tackled the real-world applications can be more enthusiastic and curious about the work. The profound interest and love for something will always result in better outcomes.
Google, which is the dream company of most of the aspiring engineers test how well the interview applicants perform in hypothetical scenarios. It is equally or even more importantly considered as a significant factor than technical knowledge. When it comes to real-world applications, the adaptability and alacrity play vital role than the theoretical knowledge. I have personally experienced situations in which, my colleagues who are new to the field with no industrial experience, tackled the hardest of problems where even the technical architecture failed to provide a solution. Considering the example of the most significant profession of teaching, a good teacher is not often the one with the greatest experience. Sometimes, some students can spread their wisdom in a much enchanting way than a teacher. It is the inbuilt quality and talent of an individual.
However, the one without experience might indeed be taciturn paradoxically loquacious because of the lack of exposure to the job culture, but all they need is little polishing. People who have expertise in a field can work efficiently in the beginning as they are acquainted with the methods. But considering the long run, an individual who has equal qualification as the experienced professional in all aspects will do much better in 2 years than the later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | Pranav Pipada | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | Tanub922 | 79 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | jdkarmakar2021@gmail.com | 83 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you di 75
- According to recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in the older year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by more reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 50
- Argument task The following appeared in a petition presented by classen university students to the school s administration The purpose of higher studies is to prepare students for the future but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the 83
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified the job should go to the applicant with more experience 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to job'
Suggestion: to job
...states that among two equally deserving job aspirants, the one with experience in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1367781155 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06757261615 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550151975684 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3181789712 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236161003142 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672907879544 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658284527242 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157479310158 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107541554564 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.