The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The tabular data depicts the average spending which was done by Australian families on a monthly basis for essential and non-essential goods and services in 1991 and a decade later.
Overall, it can be manifested that the spending done by the Australians augmented though the increase was minimal. Interestingly, the highest expenditure in both the years was for food, whereas the least was on clothes.
To commence with, since the past decade, Australians ended up spending $715 compared to $675 ten years back and amongst it, the expenditure of an Australian family was the highest for food in both the years with an increase of 5 dollars. A similar rise took place for housing, where the former one ended at 160 dollars and the latter one with 100 dollars. Notably, electricity and water had the highest growth of 45 dollars (from $75 in 1991 to $120 in 2001).
However, an opposing trend can be witnessed as the money spent on clothing and transportation, where clothing had the lowest share of the figure in 1991 and it further declined in 2001 from 30 dollars to 20 dollars respectively. Likewise, a similar drop of 25 dollars took place in the given period for transportation ending at $45. Finally, the combined spending on other items increased by $20($250 to $270).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Phuong Khanh | 73 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Providing a national system in a country where the unemployed receive a regular payment only encourages people not to seek work and puts an unreasonable strain on a country s financial resources Discuss this statement and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows the process of distilling salty water into fresh water 72
- These days many countries help other countries by giving free food medical or other aid What are the benefits and drawbacks of this for countries that give and receive 73
- The table shoes the percentage of young people who were working in different sectors in one country in 2005 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, likewise, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82949308756 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8202162579 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7230656157 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199376368853 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711182554392 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687212571135 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119494212299 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575426324152 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.