The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph illustrates the number of tourists visiting a specific Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Overall, it is clear that the visitors staying on cruise ships were lower (0,3 million) than visitors which stayed on island (0,8 million) in 2010. But during the 2013 and 2017 the visitors staying on cruise ships were increased sharply than other ones.
Firstly, the tourists who chose staying on island were indicated steadily results (1,5 million) on the line graph between 2013 and 2015. And the visitors which preferred staying on cruise ships decreased slightly from 0,5 million in 2011 to 0,3 million in 2012. And a similar situation was observed here on visitors which stayed on island. There was a 1,5 million tourists in 2015 but in 2016 it was slightly declined to 1,3 million tourists.
Finally, there was a very high influx of tourists in total which was demonstrated by line graph. There was only dramatical increasing. In 2010 it was only 1 million but in 2017 there was a big revolution and the number of tourists in total was 3,5 million.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organizations 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to stay'.
Suggestion: to stay
... ones. Firstly, the tourists who chose staying on island were indicated steadily resul...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere on visitors which stayed on island. There was a 1,5 million tourists in 2015...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41520862481 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0096535657 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228098293186 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120549979712 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169278553027 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224060183387 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219726330449 0.0819641961636 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.