Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With regards to bestowing and trading data, a few people accept that talking is more impressive than composing. By and by, I feel that the two strategies can be powerful types of correspondence, however it relies upon the particular condition with regards to which is the most proper at that point.
From one viewpoint, talking is a very compelling and productive method of correspondence in specific settings. Oral correspondence empowers individuals to sincerely associate with their audience members. The tone of somebody's voice can effectively pass on a wide scope of feelings, and that is the reason a few people can motivate and impact others essentially through a ground-breaking discourse, or a tune, or piece of verse. Besides, false impressions can likewise be effectively forestalled when individuals cooparate vis-à-vis. For instance, in the event that one individual is befuddled about the thing the other is saying, he can promptly request further clarification to guarantee that their message is totally perceived.
Then again, composing can likewise be a successful device in regular correspondence. In the working environment, composed messages, messages, and reports are powerful devices, while discourse may some of the time be overlooked or deciphered in an unexpected way, composed structures are generally expressed plainly. Workers can hence rehash archives more than once to keep away from miscommunication. Furthermore, composed records are generally needed in legitimate techniques. This is the motivation behind why numerous significant records including reminders, reports, sets of expectations, and messages are normally kept in composed structure.
Taking everything into account, both spoken and composed methods of correspondence have their own motivations, advantages and downsides, and individuals need to deliberately consider which mode to apply in every particular circumstance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days 91
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 79
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Many people believe that the increasing use of modern technology at work and in leisure is reducing people s creativity To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e powerful devices, while discourse may some of the time be overlooked or deciphered in an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unexpected way" with adverb for "unexpected"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of the time be overlooked or deciphered in an unexpected way, composed structures are generally expr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, while, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83687943262 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38186341399 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0790264049 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0514954368894 0.244688304435 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185454857483 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284023710398 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0342044974658 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247237396467 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.