Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Many people argue that it is necessary for students to learn about food scientifically and how to cook food. Although I agree with this idea, I believe that time for food science should be made up very little since students still have to spend time at school on other subjects.
On the one hand, lessons in food theory and food safety will benefit students in different aspects. In terms of food theory, students will have a chance to get to know how food is made under chemical and physical interactions. For example, by learning the fundamentals of making bread, students realize that the sough dough is fermented with yeast before being baked in the oven at a proper temperature. Additionally, with food safety, students are fully equipped with how to cook food properly and how to preserve cooked food. Thanks to the food lectures, young people know which temperature of a well-cooked chicken is and how many hours for a frozen chicken to be thawed. Knowing this kind of knowledge enable students to raise their awareness of food and protect their health better.
Having said this, lectures on food science and food preparation should not make up the vast majority of the school curriculum to avoid the time deficiency for other subjects. Students necessarily study about food to serve their lives and others, but they also need to learn math, literature and arts for their future career. Lessons of food could be taught further at school if students wish to pursue a professional culinary career; otherwise, most of the school time should be spent on solving math questions and writing essays so that students can graduate in time.
In conclusion, it is ideal if schools give one or two lessons in their syllabus to teach students about food and focus on other subjects for the rest of the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-24 | thuonghoai2831999 | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | Hanachan123456789 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 78
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their 67
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83818770227 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52614236563 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1703055034 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313377817421 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13091120979 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058452899093 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220765155793 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509623920102 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.