Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt urges the government officials to rely on their own jedgements rather than blindly follow the suggestions of the people they serve. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the concept and hereby obliged to provide necessary elaboration of certain points in defense of my position.
To begin with - government officials are the people who have been elected by the people or based on a certain fundamentals. As these are the people who are chosen by mass personalities or by a certain process through which they has to undergo in order to prove their worth, so there willbe no harm in believing that they can manage their respective prospects and can take better decisions when needed. However, cases got diverted here. If the governement is self-proclaimed then it might be the case that the officials are doing at their owns. They might try to neglect the bigger purposes and only count on their fulfillments. On the other hand - there are governemnts which are chosen by the layperson or by a certain group of people to serve their purposes. The statment given in the prompt might not hold any position for the earlier one as it will follow its own in any way. Contention arrives for the second - the public elected one. For example - in many cases there arrives indecisiveness among the people regarding any prdicament. People as a whole might differ in accord to their opinions. Now, if the government tries to follow all the opinions or the suggestions of the people then no accomplishments can be possible by the governments. Consequently, problem will remain as same, however, in history people will regard this type of government as a disgraceful failed one, although it was their own chosen.
Another contradictoryconcepts arises here - that is to say if the government relied only upon their own decisions then how will they serve the people in any matter if they are not open to the suggestions of their people? The fact is that people choose their governements and also the officials. The concept government is such that - a group of people who are elected based on their acceptance among the people, regarding maintaining social, economical, political development and calmness. So, it is derivative tio believe that the government will reflect the the views and opinions of the same people who have chosen them. That means of a government takes a certain decision about a certain topic then we can conclude that it is the decision of the mass people or that group of people the governement serves. In this prospect - there is actually no need to blindly accept the suggestions of the people for a governement; holding its own decision, as the decisions will not differe.
Now, there may arrive some cases where a government has to take some bold decision. It can undoubtedly be accepted that people are chosing the people as government officials; whose intellects, decision-making ability and justice are pretty creditable for them. So, it might not be harmful to accept that the government officials will possess better decision making ability than other layperson. So, keeping that fact into consideration it might be needed sometimes for the government to do something that is in contrast with the major opinions of the folks. For example - there might be some situations when the simple people will be very emotional and as a result might conduct a poor decision out of their sentiment that might oppose them after. But in case for the government it will not do any kind of stupidity rather will take into account of the chores very pragmatically which will actually help the group of people to flourish.
So, looking at the points mentioned above, it can be stated that government should make a balance when taking a decison on any important matter of a nation or for the group they serve, not blindly follow the people or not being too autocratic.
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 65
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 66
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 58
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fundamental'?
Suggestion: fundamental
...ted by the people or based on a certain fundamentals. As these are the people who are chosen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...by a certain process through which they has to undergo in order to prove their wort...
^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eded. However, cases got diverted here. If the governement is self-proclaimed then...
^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...elieve that the government will reflect the the views and opinions of the same people w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...elieve that the government will reflect the the views and opinions of the same people w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, then, as to, for example, in contrast, kind of, as a result, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3256.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 659.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94081942337 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06665523852 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84519881904 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418816388467 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1014.3 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6161080967 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.592592593 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4074074074 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.62962962963 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243735317737 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814395342504 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563098748423 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152932490249 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047971717854 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.