n the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon ever-increasing use of the Internet and its corresponding impacts have sparked a massive controversy. In this regard, some people believe that, in not far distant future, there is no need to purchase traditional books and newspapers because of reaching them online. In my mind, the ability to read online materials without paying have several teething and long-term problems regarding the public access of online materials and financial matters.
Obviously, more and more e-books and online newspapers are available through the universal spread of Internet. However, remarkable number of individuals are even not aware of the existence of worldwide web, let alone the ability to read online articles. Meanwhile, numerous precious literatures alongside top-secret documents are not allowed upload on the online world.
In addition, one of the major factors in terms of reading everything without charge is copyright. Leading authors and giant publishers, like a kingdom, make profits through selling their work and publications, whether printed or online. Consequently, utilizing online materials paves the way to decline of their monarchy.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of the advocators. They are of the opinion that, nowadays, vast expansion of such electronic information as newspapers, books, blogs, and everything of which you might think, lead to cut far fewer trees and help to alleviate the environmental concerns which mankind faces. Moreover, miscellaneous unwealthy nations such as African people should have the same opportunity as say, European population to access and read masterpieces of literatures of the four corners of the globe. Hence, online materials may be one plausible answer.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments about this matter, I opt to support vigorously the idea that, it is unlikely that printed materials will be eliminated thanks to online facilities and reading them without paying is an ambitious, sweet dream. Can you deprive yourself the scent of a new-bought printed novel while you are turning its pages?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- City population has been growing rapidly To cope with this problem should we rely on city planners or new policies 88
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 77
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun teething seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some teething'.
Suggestion: some teething
...ad online materials without paying have several teething and long-term problems regarding the pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94416796396 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4566508755 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228177806567 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598888067748 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443406291426 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110406165928 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040219471791 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.