Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.
What problem does it cause?
What could be done to encourage people to buy local products?
These days, grand enterprises have enormous budgetary allocations for marketing and promotion, and consumers, consequently, tend to purchase their commodities. This tendency brings about significant influences on the economic foundation. With an intention to iron out these matters, some viable resolutions will be depicted in this essay.
To begin with, the dissimilar funds for marketing and advertising among the large and home-run firms are the underlying element prompting the economic imbalance. With big capital, large companies stand a great chance of exaggerating their reputation as well as their products’ value. Due to these boosts, buyers will be attracted to shop promotional items while local non-promotional ones are commonly ignored. This renders businesses less competitive and triggers the large enterprises’ monopolization in the market which leads to limited diversity of services. Thus, family businesses have to confront a significant loss in avenue or even be on the verge of closing down.
To tackle the adverse impacts above, the authority should enforce regulations to facilitate domestic establishments. Initially, exempting small manufacturers from a few taxes is a primary prerequisite. It lays the foundation for them to lower the running cost and expand their productions to maximize the revenue. The government can assist domestic producers with entitling local entrepreneurs to join commercial exhibitions or advertising their goods on the state channels This will accelerate their renown and arouse public interest in opting for town-made commodities.
In conclusion, while large establishment embrace a number of utilities from the expenditure on publicity and marketing, it still brings home-run companies considerable adversities. Therefore, it is time for the government to take action to bridge the gaps between these firms.
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- Many students now have the opportunity to study in other countries Studying abroad may bring some benefits to some students but it also has a significant number of disadvantages Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85714285714 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26350808887 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4806529847 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.214285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181635529697 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552715751964 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432007531496 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097538375127 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633663849278 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.