TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Bringing up a decent and healthy generation has always been the ultimate objective of all psychologists and sociologist in the world since it can guarantee a nation's development. With this in mind, society, parents, teachers, authorities, etc., strive to restrict the behavior of the young to guide them into the right path. But, the questions is to what extent this limitation is beneficial. As far as the defining a framework for children is concerned, some are of the opinion that young people are more restricted these days, while others believe otherwise. I-for one- subscribe to the latter idea on the ground that today parents give more independency to their kids, children are more informed, and also there some supporting rules that assist the young.
To begin with, despite their own parents in old days, nowadays parents are more aware of the consequences of confining their children too much. Most of them acquire the knowledge of treating with their kids even before their baby is born. As a result, they know that being restrict and not letting their children to experience and make decisions would have detrimental effects on their future. So, while parents try to show their kids the way, simultaneously they give them more freedom to grow.
Second, in the modern world of today, with all these technological advances and easily accessible information, teenagers can obtain data about all matters. Consequently, they have enough knowledge about everything which makes them capable of making decisions and not obeying rules as a blind person. For example, parents cannot give false information to their kids about campaigning in forest to scare them to not go.
The last but not the least reason which reinforces the preceding assertion that young people have more freedom these days has to do with the government rules. There are some effective rules that prevent parents or other people to restrict or bother the children. For instance, in the past physical hitting the children or even imprisoning them in cellar for some days were common. However, thanks to strong regulations in recent years parents would suffer serious consequences if they conduct these kinds of actions. So, these rules prevent people to restrict the young.
All in all, taken into account what was already mentioned, I do believe that young people are not limited so much in these days because parents have come to their senses and are more supportive, juveniles are more knowledgeable, and regulations advocate the young.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- Storing medical information of patients in electronic rather than handwritingsSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The possibility of using stars for navigation by the humpback whales 80
- possibility of flying the ancient pterosaurs. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...t in the world since it can guarantee a nations development. With this in mind, society...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66133216184 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5186772897 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108403089941 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400977874387 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406936528515 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670045880129 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278857553801 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.