Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is deemed by a section of society that the non-profit organization organizations should only extend aid to the local population instead of working with people of other nations; others, however, disagree and claim that geography should not be a factor in determining whether needy people get help or not. I believe that although it might seem difficult to run relief operations overseas, yet the institutions must try their best to help ease the pain of down-trodden populace irrespective of where they live.
The view that charities should only help people living near them is bolstered by some reasons. The first argument that is made in this idea’s favor is that it is would be considerably easier for the charitable trusts to give a hand to the people in their own locality. The reason behind this view is, the country’s own organizations would be more sympathetic to the plights of the deprived as they would be aware of the context and the circumstances of their area much better than some international trust. Thus, they would be able to give personalized support rather than meaninglessly pouring money to a cause that they do not understand. Secondly, since the charity collects majority of the money from the philanthropists, companies or organizations in their vicinity, it only makes sense to return back to the same society which has given something to them. It is also understandable that in order to assert influence over the people of their country, those help givers may want to be promoted as such in the area only from where they will gain something, either in the form of money, reputation or goodwill.
However, helping people overseas may harbor much more benefits to the charity, and to the country where it has its roots, I believe. The most conspicuous advantage is rise in profile of the source country. It is obvious that if an aid organization helps the plight stricken of other country, it will become famous, and the same will happen to its nation. This will also increase the sense of brotherhood and enhance the connections among various nations and their natives. Apart from this, not every nation healthy enough from fiscal perspectives, so the population of these nations may be left on their own. In these cases, only the NGO’s of financially sound areas are able to give provisions to the needy. For example, Africa is a country which has sought help from charities from around the world so that its people can lead a better life.
In conclusion, I vehemently believe that due to some reasons, mostly money related, it is far better to provide aid without taking into account some man made boundaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | drmona.914 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-23 | Amityy | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...populace irrespective of where they live The view that charities should only help...
^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sons The first argument that is made in this ideas favor is that it is would be cons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 785, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...n their vicinity it only makes sense to return back to the same society which has given som...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80580357143 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67714154543 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493303571429 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 448.0 20.2975951904 2207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2153.0 106.682146367 2018% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 448.0 20.7667163134 2157% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331510744045 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.331510744045 0.084324248473 393% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18735382452 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856171957785 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 225.2 13.0946893788 1720% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -374.78 50.2224549098 -746% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 176.8 11.3001002004 1565% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.1 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.1 8.58950901804 339% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 181.2 10.1190380762 1791% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.