Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some museums and art exhibitions have an entry fee, whereas others' admission is free. Although charging an entrance payment is the main source for the building's maintenance, free admission would lead to more visitors to these historical sites. In my opinion, the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
One of the main advantages of allowing people to visit museums without any charging money is to attract more individuals. For example, a lot of people are interested in art but do not have sufficient funds to waste on entrance fees. By canceling this amount of money, more human beings are being able to enter. In this way, museums and art galleries would be well-known even outside of the country. Hence, the more tourists are attracted, the more the building and the city can benefit. Also, these sites consider cultural and educational spots for the students. If schools are encouraged to send their scholars to museums, it will help the youngsters to learn more deeply about their culture.
In contrast, if charging admission fees are taken away, the museums or art galleries may run at a loss or cause the structure to deteriorate. Maintenance is essential to uphold the buildings, so they ensure these places still stand in the future. Besides, there are some procedures that can be taken. For instance, the administration can provide a high technology protection system that includes advanced security cameras. In addition to that, individuals may donate some money, which can be used for maintenance, if they like.
In conclusion, preserving museums and art exhibitions and conserving such cultural buildings is necessary. However, abolishing entrance payment can help them to receive an influx of people. For that reason, the advantages of eliminating admission fees outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | mary.ssherr | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | damn999 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
- The table shows the current packaging recycling rates and the recycling targets of various packaging materials for three consecutive future years 79
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The diagram below shows how paper is made and recycled 73
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets other people prefer to do their food shopping online Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ance payment is the main source for the buildings maintenance, free admission would lead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (pr) must be used with a third-person verb: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
...s or art galleries may run at a loss pr cause the structure to deteriorate. Maintenan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29065743945 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87938760053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5317997959 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9444444444 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336260117767 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952747023861 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109431650918 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210196579546 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924270440164 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.