In a numbers of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities, others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss these both views.
People have different views with regard to spending money on transportation amenities. Some people argue that money should be spent on constructing railway lines, while others say on improving existing public transports. In my view , I support the views that existing services should be funded.
On the one hand, there are two prominent reason why some people hold the opinion that spending a huge budget on railway lines. The first roots might be that it contributes to save time and in the alliance of trade among cities and countries. Alongside the advance technology and rising demand of people is bound to connect each other, and thus high infrastructure are required. Moreover, another reason is that a massive development of railway line could help to decrease the congestion of private vehicles. People could be attracted in railway if they get convenient services. For example, Japan is becoming a less congested country because of huge and convenient development of railway path.
In spite of benefits about construction of fast train’s paths mentioned above, I support the view that money should be spent on improvement of existing public services such as, highway. The first objective is that these services are cheaper than railway because from the construction of tracks of railway to advance devices and trains might cost a large amount of money instead of construction of road highway. In addition, existing services, which is frequently used to solve the daily disruptions and provide easy access to travel a short distance, are beneficial to continue the mobility of societies and countries.
In conclusion, despite that railway transport provides massive assistance, I supported the views that improving and restoration of existing public transportation should be financed as it brings the uninterrupted mobility over societies and countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | anoj adhikari | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | Anabahari | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | minhtrieutr | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | minhtrieutr | 73 | view |
- In recent years life has become more stressful than it has ever been as a consequences more and more people are suffering from stress related problems What factors are contributing to this increase What do you think can be done to overcome the current pro 67
- many countries import a large amount of foods from other parts of the world to what extent it is positive or negative 56
- Some people think that children should only read academic books Others believe that reading books for entertainment is equally important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 88
- Nowadays creations of technology such as robots are using rapidly all over the world What do you think does these development have more advantage or disadvantage 78
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 33
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g existing public transports. In my view , I support the views that existing servi...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are beneficial to continue the mobility of societies and countries. In conclusi...
^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mobility over societies and countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view, in spite of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39726027397 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92149373225 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.513205423 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380369613948 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126909063843 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951825435208 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225116050823 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737033039364 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g existing public transports. In my view , I support the views that existing servi...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are beneficial to continue the mobility of societies and countries. In conclusi...
^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mobility over societies and countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view, in spite of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39726027397 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92149373225 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.513205423 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380369613948 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126909063843 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951825435208 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225116050823 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737033039364 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.