Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults. Thus, it is better to learn languages in childhood.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people think that children can quickly master the new language compared to grown-ups. In this essay, I will strongly agree with the statement. Firstly, I will discuss how school-going children have excellent grasping power and focus. Secondly, I will explore how adults are more distracted and burdened with their responsibilities.
To begin with, there is a saying that, children are like a lump of clay that is waiting to be molded into something beautiful and unique. Therefore, they have extremely quick grasping power. In addition to that, the concentration of young kids during their learning phase is strong, they are extremely focused and dedicated. Learning a new skill or a new language excites kids and hence, it is always helpful to incorporate this into their curriculum during their childhood.
On the other hand, in the case of adults, they are always burdened with a lot of responsibilities and hence do not have time and energy to learn new things. Additionally, due to the stress of work and social relationships, they lack concentration as well as focus. This results in difficulty while getting used to a new habit or learning a new language. For example, let’s assume the class timing is 8 pm in the evening for the new course. In the case of adults, they will be completely drained out in terms of energy and excitement after a long and exhausting day at work, whereas kids will approach this course with the same excitement as in the morning.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the claim stating that it’s always helpful and better to learn new languages in childhood. Children have more focus, concentration, and time to learn new things compared to adults.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
2022-08-28 | tieneenne | 61 | view |
2021-10-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
2021-05-04 | Firdouspathan | 61 | view |
2020-10-20 | trần ngọc tuấn | 77 | view |
- University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies Do the advantages of studying abroad outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport Write a report for a university lecturer describing the infor 73
- You recently ordered a small item online but when it arrived it was unusable Write a letter to the company that sold you the item In the letter give details about the order you made explain what was wrong with the item tell the company what you want them 100
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Throughout education boys often play sports for longer and more often than girls Why do you think this is Do you think this should be changed 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: PM_IN_THE_EVENING[1]
Message: Use simply 'pm'.
Suggestion: pm
...ple, let’s assume the class timing is 8 pm in the evening for the new course. In the case of adul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9823943662 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88048614929 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531690140845 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9543919772 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115615285849 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453642184266 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419453907172 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904128154868 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491196167882 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.