It is important for all cities and towns to have large outdoor public spaces, such as parks or squares. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years, many countries are showing great interest in building outdoor space in urban areas. While some argue that constructing public sites is such a waste of money and is not necessary, I strongly believe that parks and squares provide urban dwellers with tremendous merits.
First of all, enhancing citizens’ mental and physical health is one of the biggest advantages of outdoor spaces. These places provide a large area for city people to exercise like running, playing sports, as well as a green space to get away from the pollution of the city which is free of charge. For example, many people have the habit of running in the parks to either maintain their health and relax every day. Moreover, city dwellers can enjoy lots of leisure activities in these places to strengthen their mental health. Lots of festivals, concerts and special events can be held in the city square which enables all citizens to attend. Besides, outdoor parks are ideal places for individuals to meet up with friends and broaden their circle of relationships. Let’s take the walking street in Hoan Kiem lake as a typical example, this site is always crowded with youngers coming there for playing, chatting and wandering every night and weekend.
Secondly, the city’s image is closely attached to its outdoor public spaces. Having vast and splendid zones for citizens can prove the city’s robust economic potential as constructing these places does not only require the support from government but also the fund raised by the city’s dwellers. In addition, the investment in recreational places for the public is likely to attract a great number of tourists from both local people and outsiders. As a result, the economy of the city or town would be significantly boosted. The new square in Tuyen Quang province, for instance, from its establishment has attracted thousands of visitors each year coming for the Full Moon festival which is held in this place. Thanks to that, the city’s tourism has developed dramatically, and local people have gained a great fortune by lending their houses as homestays for the tourists.
In conclusion, even though constructing outdoor spaces might cause pressure for the cities and towns, I firmly advocate that they are indispensable parts of urban life with immense benefits for either the city itself and the citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-21 | quynhhuong656 | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-05 | namtq289 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | cumaihuong99 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | Singhfilms | 61 | view |
| 2014-10-01 | prathapreddy | 86 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 and 2010 84
- Men and women employed in full time jobs have to share evenly household chores and caring for children at home Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 89
- The map illustrates the change of an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 73
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1188630491 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58331516012 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571059431525 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5708353406 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317806888803 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977444287319 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335901849271 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185024785927 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245006126794 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.