Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production. Some people think that as land is becoming scarce, the world’s meat consumption should be reduced.
What measures could be taken to reduce the world’s meat consumption? What kinds of problem might such measures cause?
There should have limitations on consuming meat when land crop production for producing meat is in short supply. Several measures can be mapped out to deal with this issue, accompanying with certain problems.
On the one hand, there are a great deal of measures to be listed regarding meat consumption. To begin with, governments are able to impose on higher price of meat, which aims at the consumer psychology when the majority of the residents are increasingly dependent on this food. As a result, this restriction can deter people from having meat portions in their meals. In addition, government’s introduction on recipes including a higher portion of starch and vegetable compared to meat is also viable. Adding alternatives on daily meals without meat allows consumer to adapt themselves to a more healthy lifestyle, not to mention reducing the risk of obesity and help individuals get lean.
On the other hand, such measures can lead to certain problems accordingly. Needless to say, lower consumption on meats may have disadvantages compared to the efforts of agrarian and farmers. Technically, the proportion of exporting meat can fall into a nosedive and meat industry can be heavily affected, which leads to detriments on the economy. Moreover, as regards people that is engulf into meat, less absorption on it may make them face with fatigue, dizziness due to lack of protein. Consequently, having lows in nutrition can influence on their effectiveness at work and in daily life
In conclusion, it can be seen that different measures can be listed while there are many problems correlate to it
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-06 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ms. On the one hand, there are a great deal of measures to be listed regarding meat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...portion of exporting meat can fall into a nosedive and meat industry can be heavily affect...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'engulfed'.
Suggestion: engulfed
...my. Moreover, as regards people that is engulf into meat, less absorption on it may ma...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, as regards, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16030534351 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95616046256 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1768810309 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0833333333 7.06120827912 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272802889259 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101539863608 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05873623811 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168405190356 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408927343731 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.