In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Nowadays, congestion is a considerable concern in the globe in general and especially the developed countries in particular. Some argue that laws such as heavy taxation on private transportation should be implemented in order to tackle the issue, whereas the others believe that method would be counterproductive. In this essay, I will discuss about the merits and demerits of establishing the mentioned law.
On the one hand, it is clear that there are benefits by having the individuals to pay more for their usage of personal vehicles. One of those pros would be the instantly positive effect on the traffic system as these people become increasingly less likely to commute on their own. That is because of the economic incentive, as more and more value are added into utilizing public commutations, people whose possess heavy financial burdens would immediately transfer to these means. Moreover, such regulations could generate a tendency in which citizens would prefer not to own a vehicle from the first place. One reason for this is that drivers are attracted by the cost effectiveness from general transportation thanks to the enforcement of strong tax payment for private cars, which leads to a circumstance that family would try not to buy any car altogether.
On the other hand, the cons created from these laws tends to outweigh their pros. Firstly, by imposing harsh restrictions on how much people should pay to drive automobiles, the government would increase the change of rebellion among the society. For example, drivers would have an incentive to damage public commutations to revenge the state for stealing their freedom of choices and their hobbies in spite of the impending fines. Secondly, citizens would lose trust in the state as a whole because of the tyranny methods of decreasing traffic jaws. Although the government can gain favorable short-term outcomes, it would be meaningless if there is hesitation for law enforcement in the long run caused by the respective community. In other words, there are noticeable trade-offs utilizing these regulations to solve transporting problems.
In conclusion, while fixing the current issues regrading to congestion and commuting accidents are imperative not only for a person but also for a whole society, the consequences of tax increments should be carefully considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Is invention of robots fruitful or dangerous Discuss advantages and disadvantages 89
- Businesses should have social responsibilities in the communities where they operate To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
..., by imposing harsh restrictions on how much people should pay to drive automobiles,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30831099196 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9989084881 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573726541555 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1877808394 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116619631278 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363368737681 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354343056042 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705147299324 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161555986452 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.