Some people believe that all cities and towns should have at least one large public open space. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of publicly available open spaces in cities and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of green spaces is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that urban development strategies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, allocating more urban spaces to parks can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of physical health are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the role of leisure facilities in towns. Hence, beneficial ramifications of the city planning requirements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, investing more in open spaces might increase the consequences of cities' environmental issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of polluted cities could relate to the reality that the demerits of greenhouse gases are negatively correlated. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has demonstrated the downsides of citizens' physical activities in modern towns. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of urban studies.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of constructing more open spaces in urban areas far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of environmental problems prove the significance of the city founders but also pinpoint industrial towns' implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-02 | firefox123 | 77 | view |
| 2021-05-26 | vahidmetall | 52 | view |
- Some people think air travel has more negative impacts than positive impacts on modern life What do you think 92
- There are both advantage and disadvantage of company workers accessing their own products and services Discuss 78
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 85
- Advertising may make people buy something they don t need or cannot afford but also they can convey information to increase their life quality What is your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64750957854 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24433078491 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659003831418 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8559954154 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161180245538 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516406086834 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415020424612 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922177595005 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298245341511 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.