With the increase of digital information available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
Recently, the phenomenon of online virtual information and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debtate. Although contested by many that the matter of univeristy libraries is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online materials can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, high technology developments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of online libraries and virtual education are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered technological libraries. Hence, beneficial ramifications of electronic books apparently can bee seen.
Within the real of science, the age of information might increase the consequences of printed books. Moreover, fundamental aspects of librararies' problems could relate to this reality that the downsides of modern libraries are significantly negative. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has demonstrated negetive aspects of textbooks' requirements. Therefore, it would be correct if we could presume the preconceived notions of the internet infrastructures.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of computerized information far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the major technological advances in universities prove the significance of virtual books, but also pinpoint implications of a source of information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91164658635 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49144532834 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674698795181 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3762684699 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167568307386 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499485055713 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266135927371 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892850242347 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026532954036 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.