Some people believe that all cities and towns should have at least one large public open space. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The idea that all cities and towns should have at least one large public open space, which lies among arguable debates, has again sparked controversy. Some proponents maintain that it is important to maintain at least one of those, while opponents claim that space should be reserved for housing and other improvements. This essay will put both sides of the continuous issues under scrutiny, hence arrive at a final conclusion.
To begin with, there are a myriad of reasons favour the public open area. However, the most evident one is derived from the fact that parks help in reducing pollution, thanks to their number of trees. Furthermore, other open areas such as squares are also important as they are people can hold public events such as festivals, public meetings, etc. A square can also be a historical location, attaching tourists and imperative for people to preserve it for the next generations.
Moving on to consider the opposing arguments put forward by critics, some people believe that space should be reserved for housing and other improvements. It is largely attributed to the fact that the world population keeps increasing, and cities and towns are running out of room to shelter their residents. Not only housing, the need for hospitals, schools, etc. also grows, thus more spaces are required.
Furthermore, people can choose to have other types of indoor recreations such as cinema or theatre or take a trip out of towns to enjoy open space in natural reserves.
In summary, despite both sides having valid and logical arguments, a final conclusion must be drawn, and I am deeply convinced that it is important to retain at least one public park or square for the cities and towns’ residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...clusion. To begin with, there are a myriad of reasons favour the public open area....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, so, thus, while, at least, in summary, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03135888502 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60983750565 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5835914833 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344927341351 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110668198644 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100540701419 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184206785923 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795965748142 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.