Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think this is good for the world of sports, while others think there are disadvantages of this. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Sponsoring sports has become a prevalent way that many business firms choose to promote themselves. While some individuals support this phenomenon, others believe that there is a certain degree of negativity. Personally, I agree with the former notion because both athletes and sports can experience different advantages.
On the one hand, sports receiving endorsement deals from companies as a part of their advertising campaign is considered to be positive. In fact, since the sports events require an enormous amount of money to organize and coordinate, without such financial resources from benefactors, the organizers cannot sustain the activities in the long term and improve their quality. Besides, players participating in those sports can also benefit because they have well-prepared healthcare, facilities, and equipment and completely concentrate on the competitions. Therefore, it is evident that companies granting sponsorship to sports can be significantly beneficial.
On the other hand, sponsorship contracts from business enterprises can detrimentally affect sports. Specifically, these firms use sports to reach broader media coverage to improve their brand awareness, so sports events and their TV appeal must include the advertisement of the brand image. This will disrupt the audiences’ experience while watching sports, directly deteriorating the sports’ popularity. Consequently, getting the endorsement from companies is not suitable for sports to some extend.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on determining the ultimate impacts of sponsorship from companies in their marketing strategies, I endorse the hypothesis that this practice is highly positive. While sports can be improved and develop exponentially, the sportspersons can acquire optimal conditions and achieve greater performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | huyenminh1234 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Đặng Luân | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | oanhnth | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
- The world of work is rapidly changing and people cannot depend on having the same job and the same working conditions for life What are the causes of this rapid change How can people prepare for their future work life 61
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Others think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- The process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- Many people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there is a small difference of earning between the richest and the poorest To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- More and more people in the city live in home with small spaces or no outdoor areas Is this a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...nies is not suitable for sports to some extend. To conclude, despite controversial sc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07279693487 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26853833925 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3989644855 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253169178487 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950757740819 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469427845403 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162330025065 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583331815446 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.