Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people claim that participating in team sports can bring so many advantages, while others believe that it is better for people to play individual sports such as tennis and swimming. From my perspective, each view has their own justifications.
On the one hand, taking part in individual sports like swimming or tennis is beneficial for people in some ways. Firstly, playing sports by one-self has more opportunities to enhance personal skills such as building confidence, dealing with problems and so on. To be more details, if people chose playing chess, they would learn how to develop a strong mindset, feel more confident and manage emotions to win without relying on others. Secondly, participating in individual sports is a chance to challenge themselves. For instance, players set goals of sports that they want to play and during the period, they have to train themselves of all mental health and physical health in order to achieve personal successes.
On the other hand, playing sports which are played in teams such as football or volleyball also provides a lot of benefits for players. First of all, people playing team sports can be increased some specific skills such as teamwork and communication, competitive skills. As a consequence, these skills not only help players to win the games but also improve relationships in life such as communicate with peers in the classes or workplaces. In addition, involving in team sports is one of the best way to realize one’ value in life. To be more specific, if people attending in sports like that, they can feel a part of their team to be happy, jubilant, well-being and they will have a good mental health.
To sum up, playing one-self sport is a remedy to grow personal skills and challenge players but I believe that people should take part in team sports so they can have a strong mindset and healthy body-shape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 78
- TOPIC 2 With the rise of e books comes the decline in paper books Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to play'.
Suggestion: to play
...on. To be more details, if people chose playing chess, they would learn how to develop ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96214511041 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76667481756 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529968454259 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4981217608 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371488213407 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143827327214 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117047746307 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249077526917 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03838666646 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.