Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and on society.
government should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to these who need them for their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is obvious, that popularity of mobile phones raised significantly in last decade, even thought, they could be dangerous for our well-being. Since, there is no scientific proof of harmful effect, I completely disagree that government should to regulate the ownership of mobile phones.
Firstly, it is a usual tendency that we scared from a new technology. However this opinion more popular among an older generation. Still, no significant research had conducted yet, that shows that there is a harmful effect. Most of us benefits from possessing and using daily. Moreover, mobiles is a source of information. For instance, I learnt an Italian with help of mobile app. It is said that better have all the world knowledge in your pocket than always look for un proved feares.
Secondly, mobily phones changed the way we communicate. It is often agreed that it allows us instantly connect to family and friends and navigate in a new location. I personally benefit from constant calls to my brother who lives in the opposite side of the globe.
Another example, a friend of mine had lost in a forest and was rescued by calling for a help. Moreover, it is claimed, that we need this insurance and we would be able to have connection in any life situations. Due to this reasons, mobile phone make relationships stronger and give us security.
In conclusion, a personal and such a valuable asset as mobile phone should not be restricted in any form and any price. As, it is an inevitable mean of communication and surviving in modern daily routine.
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and on society government should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to these who need them for the 61
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 61
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y that we scared from a new technology. However this opinion more popular among an olde...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lar among an older generation. Still, no significant research had conducted yet, ...
^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nnection in any life situations. Due to this reasons, mobile phone make relationship...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88593155894 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83011339822 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634980988593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5255446261 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5882352941 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24639866742 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642620615214 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640976318308 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12892438369 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078903746405 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.