Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.
In today’s world the some people make more money due to having well-paid job or inherit fortune, while others struggles with providing the basic needs of their lives. In this regard, some believe wealthy people should donate part of their wealth and income to charities. Despite the fact that people can do whatever they want with their money, it is my firm conviction that rich people should allocation a specific amount of money for donation to charities. In what follows I will elaborate my perspectives.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that wealthy people can change not only one’s life but also the society that they are living in a good way. Nowadays, most scholars and experts have realized that the main root of tremendous problems in each society is poverty. People who are living in poverty, are more likely to attract to major crime such as break in, kidnapping to earn money. Children who are living in poor families are more vulnerable to be criminals in adulthood. The result of all these would have an adverse effect on the society that wealthy people are living in too. Therefore, by donating money to charities, they can save people and society from the negative consequences of poverty.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that giving money to charities can bring them fame and a good reputation which benefits them a lot. When someone donates part of their income to humanitarian activities, the media would try to cover the news of this charitable action. By interviewing and participating in a variety of radio or television programs, a person would become famous. Moreover, this brings him or her prestige. For instance, in my hometown, a billionaire who assist to build a hospital is known as a respectful man. Most of the citizens know him, and tall about him as their hero and a great model for their children.
In conclusion, I believe it is better for wealthy people to donate some money to charities in order to have a role in improving the societies they live in and take advantages of their work by gaining respect and fame from people who are adore them and praise them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | reeya kiran | 70 | view |
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 90
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement The more money a person has the more should he or she give away to charities 80
- Has the ease of cooking improved life? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use spec 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
In today’s world the some people make more money due to having we...
^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...by gaining respect and fame from people who are adore them and praise them.
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'adored'.
Suggestion: adored
...ng respect and fame from people who are adore them and praise them.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79076086957 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58305875296 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7439116617 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120974978192 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385204728358 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380521663919 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713967735193 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323240328688 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.