The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart illustrates global pineapple exports by the three most productive nations in 2009 and 2019 while the pie chart displays the breakdown of the cost of each pineapple.
In general, while pineapple exports of country A and C rose throughout 10 years, that of country B declined. It can also be seen that distribution and retail accounted for the biggest share in the cost of a pineapple.
In 2009, country A exported over 1 million tonnes of pineapple. Over the next decade, this figure experienced a surge to over 10 million tonnes, the highest among all countries. Country C also saw a minor increase in pineapple exports. In contrast, the amount of pineapples exported by country B decreased from above 4 million tonnes to under 2 million tonnes over the examined period.
It can be seen from the pie chart that distribution and retail accounted for the lion share of 35% of the cost of each pineapple. Export costs and producer recorded the lowest statistics with 4% and 5% respectively. The remaining sectors constituted the rest of the cost with the figures ranging from 10% to 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Aashish Dhakal | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | folina | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | RTroMT | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | ThoiPhong | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 73
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83068783069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77589757481 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1317520201 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276873649581 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113752982242 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939537052785 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181286089424 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937470607968 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.