Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and deal- ing with diseases. Who do you think should fund these researches: private companies, individuals or governments?
In this day and age, humanity existence is consistently threatened with new infectious diseases and health issues and the well-being of people owes much to the unprecedented innovations of medical studies. Hence, a controversy of whether these projects should receive investment from enterprises, citizens or authorities is brought into discussion and the following essay will argue that every forces in the society should finance this sphere.
On the one hand, private firms and people can financially benefit from medical breakthroughs. In particular, by devising the cure for commonplace diseases or dysfunctions, enterprises and private investors can make lucrative earnings from selling drugs or providing therapy service. In fact, medicine production is a multi-billion-dollar industry and is increasingly prevalent in every part of the world. Moreover, the growth of health threats among the public can significantly raise the sale of medical commodities which makes allocating money into the studies for new treatment methodology and bettering the conventional ones is increasingly appealing to financiers.
On the other hand, governments also need to hold accountable for maintain the social welfares by funding the medical research. In specific, financial assistance from authorities is conducive to ensure that communal medical system is available for everyone. For instance, the underprivileged cannot afford to go to private hospitals and their lives may rely on community facilities or non-profit organization like the Red Cross. In contrast, medical treatment industry from private financiers may be a profit-greedy business whose inventions will likely to be kept exclusively to gain even more revenue; thus, dignitaries should be able to operate health projects independently.
It therefore can be concluded that in order to maintain the well-being among general public, research and medical studies to cure diseases should receive sufficient financial support from private investors, companies to authorities. At the end of the day, everyone in society need to join hand for a healthier future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-28 | Lastinfortune | 92 | view |
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 92
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from schools To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 95
- The diagrams show human s cutting tools 1 4 million years ago and 80 000 years ago Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and deal ing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... order to maintain the well-being among general public, research and medical studies to cure d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80128205128 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27502628584 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5679141313 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204903239442 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692504094248 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381393069615 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120370954443 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00556511327255 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.