The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries. The bar chart shows the results of a survey into car use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts plot the amount of journeys made by various means of transport in four nations and show the results of a poll about why the Canadian travelled to work by car.
Overall, most trips in both four states were made by car. It is also obvious that people in Canada travelled to work by car because there were no alternatives.
It can be seen that journeys made by car ranged from a low of 47% in the Netherlands to a high of 90% in Canada. Not surprisingly, the highest percentage of bicycle use was the Netherlands with 26%, followed by on foot (18%) and public transport (8%). Besides car, public transport and on foot were also two forms of transport that are common in Belgium and Germany.
In Canada, over a third of people (about 38%) used car to go to work because there were no alternatives. However, nearly a third of respondents chose car since they needed for work. Meanwhile, over 20% of people went to work by car because of its convenience, followed by its speed and work nightshift, with about 12% and 8% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | appollo abu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-21 | appollo abu | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from seawater to make it drinkable Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Individuals can do nothing to change society Any new developments can only be brought about by government and large institutions How far do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51063829787 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65269322558 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6587816215 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182991918192 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822184110851 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062964451366 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127388451853 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725432979313 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.